The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How to Avoid Train Wrecks When Using Science in Environmental Problem Solving
Abstract
Interdisciplinary collaborations are increasingly common in many areas of science, but particularly in fields involved with environmental problems. This is because problems related to human interactions with the environment typically contain numerous parameters, reflect extensive human alterations of ecosystems, require understanding of physical–biological interactions at multiple spatial and temporal scales, and involve economic and social capital. Distilling useful scientific information in collaborative interactions is a challenge, as is the transfer of this information to others, including scientists, stakeholders, resource managers, policymakers, and the public. While this problem has been recognized by historians and philosophers of science, it has rarely been recognized and openly discussed by scientists themselves (but see NAS 1986). The participation of individuals from a diverse set of scientific disciplines has the potential to enhance the success of problem solving (USGS/ESA 1998). However, obstacles often arise in collaborative efforts for several well-known reasons. First, it is often difficult to find a common language because of disciplinary specialization (Wear 1999, Sarewitz et al. 2000). Second, existing scientific knowledge (theories, models, etc.) may reflect a historical scientific and sociopolitical context that may make it ill suited to address current environmental problems and questions (see, for example, Ford 2000, NSB 2000). Third, collaborations i…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Effective interdisciplinary collaboration requires careful attention to processes and goals, and understanding and managing basic philosophical differences among team members (Benda et al. 2002;Eigenbrode et al. 2007).”
From Creating and maintaining high‐performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills (2014) · cites this paper as Benda et al. 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 1998, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124, 881, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:9(881) · DOI
- Benda, 1997, Water Resources Research, 33, 2849, 10.1029/97WR02388 · DOI
- Bosch, 1982, Journal of Hydrology, 55, 3, 10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2 · DOI · Paper page
- DuBoys, 1879, Annals des Ponts et Chaussées, 5, 141
- Dunne, 1998, Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34, 795, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb01516.x · DOI
- Fisher, 1997, Journal of the North America Benthological Society, 16, 305, 10.2307/1468020 · DOI
- Fisher, 1998, Ecosystems, 1, 19, 10.1007/s100219900003 · DOI
- Gehrke, 2001, Regulated Rivers, 17, 369, 10.1002/rrr.648 · DOI
- Gomez, 1989, Water Resources Research, 25, 1161, 10.1029/WR025i006p01161 · DOI
- Harding, 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 14843, 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14843 · DOI
- Jensen, 2000, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 64, 271, 10.1023/A:1006489624154 · DOI
- Junk, 1989, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 106, 110
- Klemes, 1988, Journal of Hydrology, 65, 1, 10.1016/0022-1694(83)90208-1 · DOI
- Ledley, 1999, Eos, 80, 453, 10.1029/99EO00325 · DOI
- Lisle, 2001, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26, 1409, 10.1002/esp.300 · DOI
- Merritt, 2002, Ecological Applications, 12, 1071, 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1071:PGHARH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Moglen, 2002, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38, 241, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01548.x · DOI
- Newbold, 1983, Ecology, 64, 1249, 10.2307/1937833 · DOI
- Palmer, 1997, Ambio, 26, 571
- Palmer, 2002, Bulletin of the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 107, 85
- Phillips, 1975, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 104, 461, 10.1577/1548-8659(1975)104<461:SEOGMO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Poff, 1990, Environmental Management, 14, 629, 10.1007/BF02394714 · DOI
- Poff, 1997, BioScience, 47, 769, 10.2307/1313099 · DOI · Paper page
- Pringle, 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7, 503, 10.2307/1467303 · DOI
- Rodriguez-Iturbe, 1979, Water Resources Research, 15, 1409, 10.1029/WR015i006p01409 · DOI
- Roth, 1996, Landscape Ecology, 3, 141, 10.1007/BF02447513 · DOI
- Sedell, 1984, Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, 22, 1828, 10.1080/03680770.1983.11897581 · DOI
- Stanford, 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 12, 48, 10.2307/1467685 · DOI
- Townsend, 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 8, 36, 10.2307/1467400 · DOI
- Townsend, 1994, Freshwater Biology, 31, 265, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb01740.x · DOI
- Vannote, 1980, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 130, 10.1139/f80-017 · DOI · Paper page
- Walters, 1999, Ecosystems, 2, 411, 10.1007/s100219900090 · DOI
- Wear, 1999, Ecosystems, 2, 299, 10.1007/s100219900080 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheruvelil, K. S., Soranno, P. A., Weathers, K. C., Hanson, P. C., Goring, S. J., Filstrup, C. T., & Read, E. K. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/130001 · Cited by 302
Nilsson, C., Lepori, F., Malmqvist, B., Törnlund, E., Hjerdt, N., Helfield, J. M., Palm, D., Östergren, J., Jansson, R., Brännäs, E., et al. (2005) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-005-0030-9 · Cited by 187
Transdisciplinary Research, Transformative Learning, and Transformative Science
Pennington, D. D., Simpson, G. L., McConnell, M. S., Fair, J. M., & Baker, R. J. (2013) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.9 · Cited by 97
Bridging the Disciplinary Divide: Co-Creating Research Ideas in eScience Teams
Pennington, D. D. (2011) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-011-9134-2 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- BENDA, L. E., POFF, N. L., TAGUE, C., PALMER, M. A., PIZZUTO, J., COOPER, S., STANLEY, E., & MOGLEN, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1127
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104574018
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 14.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BioScience (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management
- National Center For Environmental Assessment
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- interdisciplinary collaboration, environmental problem solving, science-policy interface, knowledge transfer, stakeholder engagement, academic specialization, spatial and temporal scales, science communication, ecosystem management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review